Une femme reçoit la nouvelle du décès de son mari ou de son divorce, observe son délai d'attente, se remarie, puis son précédent mari revient.

2. Muhammad has narrated from Ahmad ibn Muhammad from ibn Mahbub from ‘Ila’ (swearing) and abu Ayyub from Muhammad ibn Muslim who has said the following: “I once asked abu Ja‘far, ‘Alayhi al-Salam, about the case of a woman before whom two men testify that her absent husband has divorced her and she counts waiting period then marries; then the absent husband comes. He says that he has not divorced her and one of the two testifying people says that he has lied. He (the Imam) said, ‘The second has no way to her and the one who testified must pay the mahr (dower) to the second man and she must count her waiting period because of the second marriage. The first husband must not go near her until her waiting period is complete.’”

J'ai interrogé Abu Ja'far (que la paix soit sur lui) au sujet de deux hommes qui ont témoigné contre un homme absent devant une femme, affirmant qu'il l'avait répudiée. La femme a alors agi en conséquence et s'est remariée. Ensuite, l'époux absent est revenu en prétendant ne pas l'avoir répudiée, et l'un des deux témoins a menti. Abu Ja'far (que la paix soit sur lui) a dit : "Il n'y a pas de solution pour le dernier homme, la dot sera prise de celui qui a témoigné et restituée au dernier. Le premier a plus de droit sur elle et agira en conséquence, et le dernier ne doit pas s'approcher d'elle jusqu'à ce que sa période d'attente soit terminée."

3. Ali ibn Ibrahim has narrated from his father and A number of our people have narrated from Sahl ibn Ziyad all from ibn abu Najran from ‘Asem ibn Hamid ibn Qays who has said the following: “I once asked abu Ja‘far, ‘Alayhi al-Salam, about the case of a man whose wife thinks that he has died or is killed; thus she marries as well as his slave-girl and both give birth to their husband; then the first husband comes and the master of the slave-girl. He (the Imam) said, ‘He takes back his wife because he has the right to do so. He also takes back his slave-girl and her child or the cost of the child’s value.’”

Il doit reprendre sa femme, car il en est plus digne, ainsi que son enfant et sa compensation financière.

4. Muhammad ibn ’Isma‘il has narrated from al-Fadl ibn Shadhan from and Ali ibn Ibrahim has narrated from his father all from ibn abu ‘Umayr from Ibrahim ibn ‘Abd al-Hamid from abu Basir and others who has said the following: “About the case of two witnesses who testify that a woman’s husband has divorced her or that he has died, thus, she marries, then the husband comes, abu ‘Abd Allah, ‘Alayhi al-Salam, has stated this Hadith. ‘They are whipped for their crime. They are held responsible for the mahr (dower) to be paid to the husband for deceit; then she counts waiting period and returns to her first husband.’”

Il a été rapporté de l'Imam Abu 'Abdullah (que la paix soit sur lui) qu'il a dit à propos de deux témoins qui témoignent contre une femme, affirmant que son mari l'a répudiée ou est décédé, puis elle s'est remariée et que son premier mari revient, ils doivent être punis et le montant de la dot doit être versé au premier mari pour ce qu'il a dépensé, puis elle doit être punie et retournée à son premier mari.

5. A number of our people have narrated from Sahl ibn Ziyad and Ali ibn Ibrahim has narrated from his father all from ibn abu Nasr from ‘Abd al-Karim from Zurarah who has said the following: “Abu Ja‘far, ‘Alayhi al-Salam, has said, ‘If a woman receives news of the death of her husband or she is informed about her being divorced by her husband and she counts her waiting period and thereafter marries, then her previous husband comes. The first one is more rightful than the second one, regardless, he (the second) has gone to bed with her or not; but she can demand mahr (dower) from the second one because of his going to bed with her and the second one can thereafter never lawfully marry her again.”’

Lorsqu'un homme annonce le décès de sa femme à sa famille ou qu'ils lui disent qu'il l'a répudiée, puis elle se marie à nouveau, et que son premier mari revient en disant : "Le premier mari a plus de droit sur elle que le second, qu'il ait eu des relations conjugales avec elle ou non, et elle a droit au montant du mahr du second mari pour ce qu'il a permis de son intimité."